the player is hard to safeguard their rights

For players of Blizzard activism statement that I disagree with. As far as I know, the players in the organization for multi-play activism, this is true.Caused this thing in the final analysis is the "Blizzard elaborated attitude play more ignore the attitude of the Blizzard, players believe that the multi-play"

We know that, in the present circumstances, the player is hard to safeguard their rights, even to play. No contract agreement as a free plug-in, the D3 Gold player that is used to generate losses in the law can not constitute a threat to play more. China's Internet law is not perfect, and players even as a sovereign body are not, how about the matter put into law. Obviously it is difficult to envision the need to pay the players unable to pay the cost of a no clue.

Ever since, the players in the pursuit of legal aid road side is dead end justice irrefutable, one side is nowhere in sight able to get to the head of a stranger. Seems to be how to go, the next aid people do not have much impact. Then, to play more call Blizzard activism players will provide financial and legal assistance, and where are trying to muzzle it?